Ask the expert: What’s next for an applicant after the governing board issues unfavorable recommendations?
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, March 12, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
If the final recommendation from the board is unfavorable to the applicant, the organization should follow the process outlined in the medical staff hearing and appeal document. The MSP should consult with the organization’s legal counsel to discuss the next steps and to ensure that all legal requirements are met. Denial of membership and privileges entitles the applicant to exercise his or her rights to a hearing.
This week’s question and answer is from The Credentialing Coordinator’s Handbook, by Anne Roberts, CPMSM, CPCS.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
-
Medical Staff Briefing
This monthly resource acts as a support system by providing time-saving tools, expert advice, and analyses to help you...
-
The Medical Executive Committee Handbook, Third Edition
Updated to reflect the new 2007 Joint Commission standards, this best-selling resource offers practical tools and strategies...
-
Medical Staff Leaders' Practical Guide, Sixth Edition
Written by experienced medical staff leaders currently working in hospitals, The Medical Staff Leaders' Practical Guide...
-
The Greeley Guide to New Medical Staff Models
The Greeley Guide to New Medical Staff Models: Solutions for Changing Physician-Hospital Relations provides a roadmap for...
-
Credentialing Basics Boot Camp: Boca Raton, FL
An increased focus on quality and physician competency, has made patient safety and credentialing and privileging processes...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched