There's a time and place for expedited credentialing
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, February 5, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Anne Roberts, CPMSM, CPCS, is the director of medical affairs at Children's Medical Center of Dallas, where she oversees the medical administration, graduate medical education, and medical staff services departments.
Dear credentialing colleague:
A common question from the field that we medical staff consultants often hear is: “What can be done to expedite the credentialing process?” Physician leaders, administrators and applicants all want to know how to streamline the process and ensure a quick turnaround time for processing applications and granting clinical privileges.
For Joint Commission-accredited facilities, the standards allow the governing body to conduct an expedited approval process for initial and reappointment applicants when criteria for the expedited process (as established by the organized medical staff) is met. The first step in implementing this expedited process is to develop a policy. The policy should outline the criteria that applicants must meet in order for the governing body to grant expedited membership and/or clinical privileges. The criteria should also state that an applicant is ineligible for the expedited process if one of the following issues occur:
- The applicant submitted an incomplete application
- The medical executive committee makes a recommendation that is adverse or has limitations
Some organizations choose to add the following issues to their policy as automatically disqualifying an applicant for expedited processing. However, Joint Commission standards simply indicate that these issues must be reviewed on a case by case basis and will usually result in ineligibility:
- There is a current challenge or a previously successful challenge to licensure or registration
- The applicant has received an involuntary termination of medical staff membership at another hospital
- The applicant has received involuntary limitation, reduction, denial, or loss of clinical privileges
- The hospital determines that there has been either an unusual pattern of, or an excessive number of, professional liability actions resulting in a final judgment against the applicant
The Joint Commission standards indicate that the governing body may delegate some decision making responsibilities to a committee of at least two voting members of the governing body. These responsibilities include the authority to render decisions to grant initial appointments, reappointments, clinical privileges or modify clinical privileges.
Many locum tenens often question whether or not their credentialing and privileging can be expedited or “fast tracked.” As these standards only apply to expediting the governing body approval, they do not waive the requirement for organizations to follow their credentialing and privileging policies. While the committee approval process can be expedited, the process for credentialing remains unchanged. Organizations can send applicants or administrative leaders a copy of their credentialing, privileging, and expedited approval process policies to help clarify questions.
Remember, clear, effective communication is the key to success!
That's all for this week.
All the best,
Anne Roberts, CPMSM, CPCS
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Comments
0 comments on “There's a time and place for expedited credentialing ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- Code changes should help ease the pain when coding for facet joint injections
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Searched
