This Isn't Boston Legal
Credentialing Resource Center Connection , December 18, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection !
Anne R. Buss, CPMSM, CPCS, is a medical staff consultant based in Fayetteville, AR.
Dear credentialing colleague:
I walked by my director’s office earlier this week and noticed her staring down at a credentials file on her desk with a worried look. I waved and she motioned me in. She told me she had received a subpoena for the file she was reviewing—a scenario that is every medical staff professional’s worst nightmare.
She said that although she had already had the file copied and sent to the requesting attorney and the risk management office she wanted someone else to look at it before she met with the hospital’s attorney. I asked her if she ever had to testify in a case involving questionable credentials. She had. In fact, she said she had given several depositions before and the policies and procedures utilized in the credentialing of the medical and allied staff had always proven to be sufficient. Nonetheless, it always helps to be prepared, and that is how she wanted to approach the current situation.
She received the following guidance from the hospital attorney. Should you find yourself in a similar situation, these guidelines may be useful:
- Know the facts in your file.
- Always tell the truth.
- Take your time and think before you speak.
- Answer only the particular question you are asked and do not volunteer additional information.
- Never guess. If you don’t know, say so.
- Never volunteer any documents Leave that to the attorney questioning you.
- If the attorney objects to a particular phrase or question, listen to the objection carefully. The attorney is alerting you to a possible problem and is directing you to the best answer.
- Try to stay calm, confident, and professional.
- Do not attempt to educate the plaintiff attorney if he/she seems confused or unable to understand a term or procedure you have mentioned. It is often a trap to get you to expand on your information.
- Don’t hesitate to ask the hospital attorney about anything you don’t understand.
As I walked back to my desk, I reflected on what a heavy task it was to be guardian of the credential and peer review files, meeting minutes, and quality data.
Remember, those who are afraid to ask are afraid to learn.
All the best,
Anne R. Buss, CPMSM, CPCS
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection !
Comments
0 comments on “This Isn't Boston Legal ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- 2010 ICD-9 code updates now available online
- Master modifiers to ensure accurate reimbursement
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- Don’t be scared into silence: Affiliation letter safeguards allow you to disclose more
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Understand the H1N1 Flu and how to code it
- E-mailed
-
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- Revised MS.1.20 'huge improvement', out for comment again
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations, December 2009
- Hand hygiene rates improved through variety of reinforcement styles
- Press Ganey report: Patient satisfaction increasing across the country
- Residency Program Alert, December 2009
- Searched
