Recent court rulings
Credentialing and Peer Review Legal Insider, January 1, 2009
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Credentialing and Peer Review Legal Insider.
A Georgia appeals court has overturned a lower court’s grant of access to some materials in a physician’s peer review and credentialing files, holding that the trial court allowed access to peer review information that should have been confidential. However, the appeals court permitted access to some contents of the physician’s file.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Credentialing and Peer Review Legal Insider.
Comments
0 comments on “Recent court rulings ”
Related Products
-
Medical Staff Briefing
This monthly resource acts as a support system by providing time-saving tools, expert advice, and analyses to help you...
-
Credentialing Resource Center
CRC is now available online! Receive updates up to four days earlier than the print version and save on shipping costs.
-
The Complete Guide to FPPE
Develop effective, focused professional practice evaluations and measure practitioners’ competency with the help of medical...
-
The 15th Annual Credentialing Resource Center Symposium Seminar: Orlando, FL
The premiere event for credentialing and medical staff services professionals offers workable solutions for tough issues
-
The Medical Staff Professional's Handbook
Let your experienced peers provide you with the guidance and training you need to tackle your toughest challenges. The...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched