Appeals court overturns ruling in Poliner v. Texas Health Systems
Credentialing & Verification Update, August 5, 2008
A federal appeals court in Texas has reversed a jury decision awarding over $30 million to Lawrence R. Poliner, MD, an interventional cardiologist who alleged that the hospital and another physician improperly restricted his privileges.
Following several incidents involving misdiagnoses and missed diagnoses, the hospital held Poliner's cardiac catheterization privileges in abeyance while investigating the physician's treatment of 44 patients. Upon completing the review, the hospital suspended Poliner's privileges for a period of five months.
Poliner sued the hospital, as well as the physician leading the peer review, asserting state and federal law violations. An initial ruling found that the hospital was immune from damages resulting from the suspension of privileges, but awarded Poliner over $200 million in damages relating to the period in which his privileges were held in abeyance to continue. The court later reduced those damages to about $30 million.
The appeals court overturned the award, however, noting that the hospital putting Poliner's privileges into abeyance pending investigation was, like the suspension, undertaken with the reasonable belief that it would promote quality health care.
Comments
0 comments on “Appeals court overturns ruling in Poliner v. Texas Health Systems ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
