CRC Blog Spotlight: CAQH application
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, July 3, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Check out our CRC Blog today by logging on to www.online-crc.com/blog/. It’s your daily source for the regulatory and professional information that matters most for MSPs. If you haven’t visited the CRC blog lately, here’s what blogger Carol La Pine, MSA CPMSM, CPCS has to say about the Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare (CAQH):
Vermonter shares experience with CAQH application
Terry Burbo, CPCS, credentialing supervisor at Vermont Managed Care in Burlington, VT, and President of Vermont Association Medical Staff Services, spoke with me regarding their experience with the state’s mandate to use the Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare (CAQH) application. Terry stated that approximately five years previously, a group had organized to develop a statewide application. All that work was lost when the mandate for CAQH use was approved.
I asked Terry to share some of the barriers to implementation of the use of the CAQH application. First, it took a long time to implement partly because many hospitals were not aware of this recommendation and felt caught off guard. At first there were many complaints from providers regarding the length of time required to complete the on-line application (estimate one-and-a-half to two hours).
Another consideration was the cost to the hospitals, especially smaller facilities. CAQH now allows hospitals to form an “association” whereby the initial administration fee of $5,000 ($3,000 year each following year) can be divided among the member facilities.
In order to help providers with the application process, Terry and her group took the time to actually sit down with a provider and go through the process. They also developed a cheat sheet that informed the provider of the necessary documents that would be needed to complete the application.
Did the implementation of the CAQH application have an impact on the application processing time? Terry commented that at first it did slow the process somewhat but today they are able to average a turn-around of approximately 30 days.
Each Vermont hospital also requires additional documents in addition to the CAQH application, such as facility-specific authorization forms, group practice information, and of course, forms to request privileges.
Perhaps we can learn from Vermont’s experience as other hospitals consider implementation of the CAQH application.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Comments
0 comments on “CRC Blog Spotlight: CAQH application ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
