ICU physicians with special training offer no benefit to patients, study says
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, June 19, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
General trends in healthcare and privileging have moved toward specialty-trained practitioners. However, a recent study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine found no benefit for ICU patients treated by specialists trained in critical care compared to those treated by non-specialist trained practitioners, according to a June 3 Pittsburgh Post-Gazette article. “Despite adjustment for severity of illness, we cannot demonstrate any survival benefit with management by critical care physicians,” the researchers wrote. “In fact, patients managed by critical care physicians had higher odds of mortality than patients managed by physicians not trained in critical care medicine.”
The researchers also acknowledged the uniqueness of their findings. “Our results are surprisingly and completely contrary to previously published findings,” the authors wrote, referencing evidence that specialty-trained care providers provide superior care.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Comments
0 comments on “ICU physicians with special training offer no benefit to patients, study says ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
