Joint Commission suspends revised standard MS.1.20 implementation
Credentialing and Peer Review Legal Insider, July 1, 2008
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Credentialing and Peer Review Legal Insider.
The Joint Commission’s Board of Commissioners agreed May 30 to suspend the implementation of revised standard MS.1.20. The revised standard, which has generated significant controversy in the past few months, was slated to take effect January 1, 2009.
The Joint Commission (formerly JCAHO) approved the revised standard MS.1.20 in June 2007. Shortly after, controversy surrounding the revisions spurred the accreditor to establish a task force to define and refine the standard’s intent. The task force has since recommended the suspension of the revised standard MS.1.20 and will present its full report on the issue to The Joint Commission’s Board of Commissioners in August.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Credentialing and Peer Review Legal Insider.
Comments
0 comments on “Joint Commission suspends revised standard MS.1.20 implementation ”
Related Products
-
Credentialing Resource Center
CRC is now available online! Receive updates up to four days earlier than the print version and save on shipping costs.
-
Credentialing Resource Center Connection
National credentialing and privileging expert Sally J. Pelletier, CPCS, CPMSM, delivers useful and timely information in her...
-
Credentialing and Peer Review Legal Insider
The Credentialing and Peer Review Legal Insider provides the latest 'how-to' techniques, and practical 'working tools' to...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched