Tip of the week: Consider liability and compensation for FPPE proctors
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, May 29, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
It is important for a medical staff to consider issues surrounding a focused professional practice evaluation (FPPE) proctor, such as compensation and the possible defense of a proctor’s evaluation. Each hospital will need to come to its own conclusion surrounding these issues.
Here is one example of how a hospital addressed these issues in its FPPE policy:
“Liability of proctor: A practitioner serving solely as a proctor, for the purpose of assessing and reporting on the competence of another practitioner, is an agent of the hospital. The proctor shall receive no compensation directly or indirectly from any patient for this service, and he or she shall have no duty to the patient to intervene if the care provided by the proctored practitioner is deficient or appears to be deficient. The proctor, or any other practitioner, however, may nonetheless render emergency medical care to the patient for medical complications arising from the care provided by the proctored practitioner. The hospital will defend and indemnify any practitioner who is subjected to a claim or suit arising out of his or her acts or omissions in the role of proctor.”
More examples of FPPE policies are found in The FPPE Toolbox: Field-tested Documents for Credentialing, Competency, and Compliance, by Carol S. Cairns, CPMSM, CPCS; Sally J. Pelletier, CPMSM, CPCS; and Donna K. Goestenkors, CPMSM.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Comments
0 comments on “Tip of the week: Consider liability and compensation for FPPE proctors ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
