Avoiding reappointment hassles: Sending reminder notices and charging late fees
Credentialing & Verification Update, May 7, 2008
MSPs often struggle to recieve information for practitioners' initial appointment or reappointment in a timely manner. Although the responsibility for providing the required information lies with practitioner, there are certain things the medical staff office (MSO) can do to be proactive.
Sending out reminder notices before critical items are due to expire helps put the item on the practitioner’s radar (or the radar of his or her office staff). Some credentialing requirements, such as life support certifications, take several months to renew—the practitioner must attend a renewal course, and, at times, it can take several months to find a class with an opening.
Sending reminder notices is a courtesy, of course, but they do help keep busy practitioners on track. Reminder notices also can be helpful for the practitioner after a reappointment packet has been sent. Often, a practitioner will contact the MSP after he or she receives the reminder notice to say the packet was never received and a new one must be sent. Like hospital MSOs, physicians' offices are busy places and files can easily be misplaced. Although it is the physician’s responsibility, unfortunately this is a very common scenario (or excuse) that MSPs hear on a routine basis.
Some organizations also have implemented late fees for practitioners who fail to return their reappointment application by the due date. If your organization incorporates the fees as a part of its policies, it can deem the reapplication incomplete if the fee is not enclosed.
Comments
0 comments on “Avoiding reappointment hassles: Sending reminder notices and charging late fees ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
