Tip of the week: A 10-step guide to drafting FPPE policies and procedures (part II of II)
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, April 24, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
The following steps are intended to serve as a starting point for developing a focused professional practice evaluation (FPPE) policy and procedure (Note: Steps 1-5 appeared in last week’s Credentialing and Privileging Advisor):
6. The draft FPPE policy, methods, reporting forms, and implementation approach are presented to the MEC, department/service lines, and medical staff members for their feedback regarding the final criteria.
7. The task force modifies draft documents based on the feedback and submits the final drafts for MEC and board approval.
8. The MEC, department/service lines, and the medical staff office (MSO)/quality department implements an orientation and training program for potential physician participants/proctors to establish organization and accountability systems.
9. The MSO/quality department staff create a systematic and timely process for reporting FPPE activity and results to the credentials committee and the MEC.
10. The credentials committee annually reviews the FPPE program description to make necessary modifications and improvements based on experience and new knowledge, and recommends changes to the MEC.
These steps are from Core Privileges for Physicians: A Practical Approach to Developing and Implementing Criteria-Based Privileges, Fourth Edition, by Wendy Crimp, RN, BSN, MBA, CPHQ; Sally J. Pelletier, CPMSM, CPCS; Vicki L. Searcy, CPMSM; and Mark Smith, MD, MBA, FACS.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Comments
0 comments on “Tip of the week: A 10-step guide to drafting FPPE policies and procedures (part II of II) ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
