Standardize verification methods for credentialing audits
Credentialing & Verification Update, April 9, 2008
Does your organization conduct audits to assess the accuracy and efficiency of the current credentialing process? Perhaps you have already begun to use credentialing audits with the goals of decreasing liability risk, monitoring compliance, and improving the overall quality and safety of care provided.
Regardless of whether your facility performs audits, it's wise to take inventory of the methods currently being used to verify practitioners' credentials.
One internal requirement your organization might consider is ensuring that the medical staff office or credentialing department checks a practitioner's application within a specified time frame to ensure that it is complete. This requirement might be seen as a way to signal that the verification process can commence, and would commonly be found in the facility's credentialing policies and procedures.
Note: Subscribers to the Credentialing and Privileging Desktop Reference receive access to a unique Greeley Company tool that is helpful in organizing and standardizing specific requirements related to credentialing verification methods. The tool is found on the "Verification Request Forms" tab of the CPDR.
Comments
0 comments on “Standardize verification methods for credentialing audits ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
