CMS proposes reducing CT scan reimbursements, debate over procedure grows
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, February 28, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
In January, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) proposed changing reimbursement rates for CT scans due to concerns about radiation risks and unnecessary costs, according to a February 19 Baltimore Sun article.
However, CT scans are a popular procedure to use for heart tests and CMS has received numerous complains from cardiologists, radiologists, and other doctors who use the scan and think the proposed changes will have a negative effect on their practices, the Sun reported.
Critics of the scans argue that a CT angiography typically exposes patients to a radiation dose equivalent to hundreds of standard X-rays, according to the article. Nevertheless, some doctors aren't ready to give up the test.
"You have to put this in context. Every test is a weighing of risks and benefits," Armin Zadeh, MD, a cardiologist at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine told the Baltimore Sun. "The CMS thing has the potential to really damage the field. In years to come, this test will be the cornerstone of heart imaging."
To read the entire Baltimore Sun article, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Comments
0 comments on “CMS proposes reducing CT scan reimbursements, debate over procedure grows ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
