The Joint Commission announces MS.1.20 task force
Credentialing & Verification Update, January 30, 2008
In its continued effort to address concerns hospitals have about MS.1.20, The Joint Commission (formerly JCAHO) posted an announcement on its Web site on January 3 publicizing the formation of a task force to address the revised standard.
The 16-member group will focus on practical implementation issues and will relay concerns that hospitals have about the organizational and monetary costs of putting MS.1.20 into practice. The Joint Commission expects to hear the results of the task force at its Board of Commissioners meeting on February 29 to March 1.
The announcement highlights the following four concepts from the revised standards that the task force will focus on:
- The organized medical staff and the governing body's flexibility to place documents in or outside the medical staff bylaws
- The expectation that medical executive committee decisions reflect the organized medical staff's wishes
- The expectation that organizations that have productive working relationships among leadership will find it reasonable to implement the voting requirements of the organized medical staff
- The method to limit items that require joint approval to avoid burdening the hospital
More information about MS.1.20 is available at www.jointcommission.org.
Comments
0 comments on “The Joint Commission announces MS.1.20 task force ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
