Specialists best at reading diagnostic mammograms, study says
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, January 2, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Although healthcare organizations may grant a variety of practitioners privileges to read diagnostic mammograms, a new study suggests that practitioners who specialize in detecting breast cancer are the best at identifying cancer in these images, according to a December 12 Seattle Post-Intelligencer article.
The Group Health Cooperative's research department, which led the study, found that the ability to read these mammograms increased with the amount of time practitioners spent reading them. "[T]hose who spend at least 20% of their time on mammography are significantly more likely to identify early breast cancers," according to the article. However, the study also concluded that long-term experience in reading mammograms does not necessarily lead to an increased ability to identify cancer.
To read the entire Seattle Post-Intelligencer article, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Comments
0 comments on “Specialists best at reading diagnostic mammograms, study says ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
