Ask the expert: Which office should be responsible for verifying the credentials of vendors in the OR-the medical staff office or human resources?
Credentialing Resource Center Connection, December 6, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
The reason for credentialing vendor representatives who are going to participate in OR activities (other than if they are simply an observer, in which case they should be treated the same way that a hospital treats any observer) is to examine their capacity to provide clinical assistance to a practitioner in the OR. The people in the best position to make judgments about the clinical capacity of people who are going to assist a physician in the OR are the members of the medical staff, who may be assisted by the medical staff office.
While there are various ways in which the HR function can assist the medical staff in the credentialing process, such as by gathering information and instituting background checks, the actual determination of whether the vendor representative is clinically qualified to provide clinical support in the OR is not a process the HR is best prepared to do.
Unlike for nurses and other clinical technical personnel, this is not a situation where there are standard qualifications for vendor representatives (and it is less than clear that organizations that purport to credential vendor representatives presently have coherent and transferable standards), so the hospital is relying on clinical judgment to make these decisions. That clinical judgment should be made by the medical staff.
This question was answered by John Reiss, Ph.D., JD, a healthcare attorney with the Saul Ewing law firm in Philadelphia. More information can be found in the audio conference recording Authorizing Vendors in the OR: Create a sound policy to ensure patient safety and avoid legal risk, available here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Credentialing Resource Center Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Q/A: Correct use of modifier -PT
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- "Wall fountains" may be spreading Legionnaires to patients, visitors
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Case Management Monthly, March 2012
- Searched
