Note from Hugh
Medicare Weekly Update, October 30, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medicare Weekly Update!
Hospitals should take a close look at the OIG audit report discussed below relating to laboratory tests furnished by a Boston hospital for patients covered under Medicare's end stage renal disease (ESRD) program. I have been concerned for many years that some hospitals do not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that they are not separately billing Medicare for lab tests that Medicare considers to be included in the ESRD composite payment rate.
As discussed in the Boston audit report, hospitals must take proactive steps to ensure that:
- The hospital is not separately billing for lab tests that are considered to be included in the composite rate, unless the tests fall outside of the applicable ESRD frequency limits.
- Medical necessity exists (and is documented) when the hospital separately bills for lab tests that fall outside of the applicable ESRD frequency limits.
- The hospital is complying with the so-called "50% Rule" for panel tests. Under the 50% Rule, the hospital may not bill separately for any tests in a panel if more than 50% of the tests in the panel are included in the ESRD composite rate payment.
While the overpayment that resulted from the Boston audit was relatively small (about $62,000), should the Department of Justice decide in the future to start pursuing these types of cases under the civil False Claims Act, other hospitals could be faced with very large civil fines.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medicare Weekly Update!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
