Orthopedic company settles with DOJ for $28 million
Compliance Monitor, October 3, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
The Orthopedic Reconstruction unit of Smith and Nephew, Inc. reached a settlement with the U.S. attorney for the District of New Jersey. This followed an investigation in which the DOJ requested copies of the company's consulting contracts with surgeons.
Smith and Nephew will pay more than $28 million in civil restitution, and an external monitor will oversee future contracts between the company and surgeons. Four other large orthopedic companies were also investigated by the DOJ: Biomet, DePuy Orthopedics, Smith & Nephew, and Zimmer. Altogether the companies will pay $311 million for violating the anti-kickback statute and civil federal False Claims Act.
All of the companies have agreed to the following:
- A federal monitor will be placed at each company to review compliance with the DPAs and NPA and all future and current relationships with the company
- Each company must conduct a needs assessment to figure out the appropriate needs for educational consulting services and new product development consultants
- All new consulting agreements will require doctors to show patients their financial engagements with any company and require the companies to show the name of each consultant and what the consultant has paid on their Web site
To read more click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
