CMS to close loopholes in Stark Law
Health Care Auditing Strategies, September 1, 2007
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login.
Proposal targets physician-owned hospitals, ASCs On July 2, CMS proposed potentially far-reaching changes to Stark regulations as part of its annual physician fee schedule update. The new regulations are focused on physician-owned hospitals and ASCs. According to Robert Wade, Esq., an attorney with Baker and Daniel LLP, the five most significant proposed changes are the following: 1. "Under arrangement" services between hospitals and referring physicians will not be permitted when referring physicians own an interest in the entity performing the designated health service (DHS). Facilities must unwind and restructure these deals.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login.
Related Products
-
Strategies for Health Care Compliance
News and real-life examples to increase the effectiveness of your compliance program. Strategies for Health Care Compliance...
-
Compliance Monitor
This HTML e-mail newsletter delivers news on Medicare and Medicaid fraud and abuse, as well as recent documents and targets...
-
Medicare Weekly Update
Each issue of Medicare Weekly Update includes the latest CMS proposed and final rules, CMS manual revisions, and...
-
Medicare Update for Physician Services
Medicare Update for Physician Services is a free, monthly e-zine that delivers news and information to help physician...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched