Reimbursement changes for vaccines
Compliance Monitor, July 27, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Q: I heard that CMS is changing the way it reimburses vaccines. Can you provide any additional information?
A: Medicare published an MLN Matters article (SE0727) in which it made some significant changes regarding reimbursement of vaccines. You can read the complete article at the CMS Web site.
Following is a summary of some of the highlights:
1. Medicare will only reimburse facilities for the following vaccines:
- Flu
- Pneumonia
- Hepatitis B for immediate and high-risk patients
- Other vaccines (e.g., tetanus toxoid) when directly related to the treatment of an injury or direct exposure to a disease or condition
2. Medicare will no longer reimburse facilities for administering a Part D vaccine beginning on January 1, 2008. The new 2007 G code for administering a Part D vaccine (G0377) will be deactivated on December 31, 2007.
3. Beginning on January 1, 2008, the Part D program will cover vaccine administration costs associated with Part D vaccines. Thus, the coverage available in 2007 under Part B will cease, and Medicare will provide reimbursement solely under Part D.
4. CMS' approach was based on the fact that most vaccines of interest for the Medicare population (e.g., influenza, pneumococcal, and hepatitis B for intermediate and high-risk patients) were covered and remain covered under Part B. For vaccines that are not covered under Part B, the beneficiary must pay the physician and then submit a paper claim to his or her Part D plan for reimbursement, up to the plan's allowable charge. In the absence of communication with the plan prior to vaccine administration, the amount the physician charges may be different from the plan's allowable charge, and a differential may remain that the beneficiary must pay.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
