Note from Hugh
Medicare Weekly Update, July 24, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medicare Weekly Update!
As noted below, CMS has released the display copy of the 2008 OPPS proposed rule. HCPro's editorial staff has prepared a three page summary of the proposed rule. The summary includes some interesting comments on CMS' proposed OPPS changes from Jugna Shah, MPH, president of Nimitt Consulting. Click here to access a free copy of the summary.
The proposed rule also includes a number of proposed changes that do not have anything to do with OPPS. Theses include changes relating to:
- Medicare's Ambulatory Surgery Center payment system
- The Conditions of Participation requirements relating to documentation of history and physical exams for outpatients
- Restrictions on the ability of Critical Access Hospitals to create or acquire "off-site locations"
As also noted below, CMS issued another transmittal last week relating to reporting of present on admission (POA) indicators. Interestingly, this new transmittal is virtually identical to the POA transmittal issued in May, except that the new transmittal states in the "Summary of Changes" section that hospitals must begin reporting POA indicators beginning October 1, 2007. I discussed the latest transmittal with Pat Brooks at CMS. Ms. Brooks informed me that she does not believe that CMS intended to make any substantive changes in the latest POA transmittal. She also noted that the effective date of the latest transmittal is January 1, 2007. According to Ms. Brooks, POA reporting will not be mandatory until January 1. However, she was not able to explain why the latest transmittal stated that POA indicator reporting will be required beginning October 1. Given this inconsistency between the date listed in the "Summary of Changes" section of the transmittal and the transmittal's stated effective date, hospitals may want to check with their local FI or MAC for guidance as to when they must start reporting POA indicators. 
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medicare Weekly Update!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
