Tip: Beware of common postacute transfer pitfalls
Compliance Monitor, July 11, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Facilities often lose the full DRG payment to which they are entitled as a result of events that are out of their control and of which they are never aware. Consider the following common pitfalls surrounding postacute transfers and discharge disposition code assignments:
- The patient is discharged to an acute-care hospital (discharge status code 02). Sometimes when a hospital transfers a patient to another acute hospital, the patient receives outpatient care instead of being admitted. This is considered a discharge (discharge status code 01) and the hospital should receive the full DRG payment.
- The patient is discharged to a skilled nursing facility (discharge status code 03). The patient may arrive at the skilled nursing facility but not certify for a Medicare Part A bed, so that facility places him or her in a custodial bed (discharge status code 04). Again, in this case, the hospital should receive the full DRG payment.
- The patient is discharged to a home health agency (discharge status code 06). If the hospital refers the patient to a home health agency, but unbeknownst to the hospital the patient refuses care, then the hospital is still entitled to the full DRG payment.
"CMS would not receive a bill for the expected subsequent care, but they don't edit for that," says William E. Haik, MD, FCCP, director of DRG Review, Inc., in Fort Walton Beach, FL. "Someone needs to be an advocate for the hospital to research the claims to see if they were erroneously paid for these transfers."
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
