Pay-per-view: Groups call for NPI compliance contingency period
Compliance Monitor, May 23, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Most providers will not be ready for the May 23 national provider identifier (NPI) compliance date, according to the National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS) and the Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange (WEDI), both advisors to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on health information exchange. Whereas NCVHS is calling for a six-month contingency period from the May compliance date (or the time CMS releases its NPI dissemination notice, if it does so after May 23), WEDI is asking for a 12-month extension period from those same dates.
To find out more, order the pay-per-view article Groups call for NPI compliance contingency period. The cost is $10. Subscribers to the online version of Strategies for Health Care Compliance have free access to this article. Subscribers to the print edition can find it in their most recent issue. A $30 steal!
You can read this article and much more in Strategies for Health Care Compliance. Read tips on HIPAA, liability issue, and compliance and auditing strategies.Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
-
Strategies for Health Care Compliance
News and real-life examples to increase the effectiveness of your compliance program. Strategies for Health Care Compliance...
-
Compliance Monitor
This HTML e-mail newsletter delivers news on Medicare and Medicaid fraud and abuse, as well as recent documents and targets...
-
Medicare Weekly Update
Each issue of Medicare Weekly Update includes the latest CMS proposed and final rules, CMS manual revisions, and...
-
Medicare Update for Physician Services
Medicare Update for Physician Services is a free, monthly e-zine that delivers news and information to help physician...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched