We would like to conduct an audit of our urgent care and wound care centers. Where should we begin?
Compliance Monitor, April 20, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Q: We would like to conduct an audit of our urgent care and wound care centers. Where should we begin?
A: As you know, wound care is one of the OIG's favorite topics, having been on its Work Plan for several years. If you are reviewing wound care cases, pay particular attention to the documentation in the record to support medical necessity for the service provided.
Review the local coverage determination (LCD) for the fiscal intermediary (FI)/carrier of your state.
Click here to find LCD information, such as documentation requirements and frequency of service.
Identify those instances where a coder appends modifier -25 to an E/M code on the same day as a separately billable procedure. Determine whether a separate E/M service truly was provided over and above what is expected for any procedure.
I think you will find that the E/M is not typically warranted on the same day as a procedure. Refer to your facility's E/M guidelines regarding wound care and determine the E/M distribution.
As for the urgent care review, focus on medical necessity problems surrounding services provided, the proper capturing of all diagnoses, and assessment of the validity and reliability of the E/M criteria.
A recent review of E/M assignment at a hospital-based urgent care center revealed that staff assigned very few low-level E/M codes. As a result, the facility's E/M criteria needed some revisions.
Also, validate the documentation to support procedures, particularly wound closures.
The above question was adapted from HCPro's APC Answer Letter, April 2007. For more information click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
