Should a local psychology class be permitted to observe our dementia unit?
Compliance Monitor, April 12, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Q: A local college psychology class would like to observe residents in our dementia unit. Is this allowed under HIPAA, or do we need authorization from the residents? We would not disclose any names; the class members will just observe and ask questions.
A: This is a grey area. The privacy rule permits you to use or disclose PHI without patient authorization for healthcare operations. The definition of healthcare operations includes "conducting training programs in which students, trainees, or practitioners in areas of healthcare learn under supervision to practice or improve their skills as healthcare providers" and "training of non-healthcare professionals." It's difficult to make a clear case that college-level psychology students are training to be healthcare professionals, or that this is part of their training as non-healthcare professionals. Because these are dementia patients, they probably cannot give you authorization for students to observe them-which means you would need to get authorization from their family members. Although you would not give the students the patients' names, HIPAA considers a full-face photograph to be a patient identifier. The students may also recognize some of the patients.
I would recommend against allowing this observation. I think the contribution to the education of the students would be minimal, and this could be considered an invasion of privacy for a vulnerable group of patients.
Editor's note: Mary Brandt, president of Bellaire, TX-based Brandt & Associates, LLC, answered this question. This is not legal advice. Consult your attorney for legal matters.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
