Hosting internal social events
Compliance Monitor, April 6, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Q: With summer just around the corner, we would like to host some nice breakfasts and dinners for our physicians on weekdays after they complete their patient rounds. These would either be held at the hospital or at a local caterer. How should we proceed?
A: Pursuant to the federal Stark Law and its accompanying regulations, there are certain exceptions to the referral prohibition related to compensation arrangements. One of the exceptions relates to medical staff incidental benefits. This regulatory exception provides that compensation in the form of items or services (not including cash or cash equivalents) from a hospital to a member of its medical staff when the item is used on the hospital's campus are acceptable if each of seven conditions are satisfied.
One of the seven exceptions requires that the compensation be of "low" value. This regulatory exception specifically provides an example relating to a meal given to a physician while he or she is serving patients who are hospitalized. In 2006, the dollar equivalent for this "low" value medical staff incidental benefit had to be less than $27.
A second regulatory exception to the Stark Law places an annual limit on the non-monetary compensation from an entity in the form of items or services (not including cash or cash equivalents) to a physician. Because you did not list how much you want to spend on these breakfasts or dinners, it is not known whether these expenditures will raise any issues. A hospital must be sure to comply with the federal Stark Law, the federal Anti-Kickback statute and any relevant state statutes and regulations in its dealing with its physician staff members.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
