Judging efficiency
Compliance Monitor, March 30, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Q: Are there any independent methods to judge a physician's efficiency?
A: On March 6, 2007, the director of healthcare for the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report (GAO-07-567T) that said "physician profiling programs may have the potential to generate savings for health care purchasers."
GAO selected ten health care purchasers to review because these purchasers--five commercial health plans, a provider network, a trust fund, two U.S. states and one Canadian province--examine physician practices based upon efficiency. GAO focused its analysis upon general practice, internal medicine and family practice physicians. While efficiency can have many meanings, GAO defined efficiency as "providing and ordering a level of services that is sufficient to meet patients' healthcare needs but not excessive, given a patient's health status."
To profile physicians whose medical practices were inefficient, two approaches were studied. First, purchasers focused on the costs associated with treating a specific episode of illness. Second, purchasers focused on costs, within a specific period of time, associated with the patients in the practice.
The GAO report noted that CMS has the tools to identify physicians who are likely to practice medicine in an inefficient manner. As federal and state health care expenditures continue to grow and private employers pressure third-party payers to control the annual premium increases, it is likely that additional governmental and non-governmental groups will publish reports assessing the efficiencies and inefficiencies in the health care delivery system.
Thanks to Bruce Armon, Esq., a partner in the Philadelphia office of the law firm Saul Ewing, LLP for answering this question.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
