Audit your facility's ambulance rates to prevent inappropriate discounts
Health Care Auditing Strategies, April 1, 2007
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login.
Auditing a healthcare facility is no easy task, and it's embarrassing when something falls through the cracks. But what is even worse is when situations arise about which you would otherwise have no clue, such as inappropriate, unwritten contracts with ambulance services.
Swapping-when a hospital or nursing home takes a discounted rate from ambulance companies for transports (e.g., Part A patient transports) in exchange for referring all of the other nonfacility responsible transports (e.g., Part B patient transports)-is one of the newest enforcement risks facing hospitals and other health facilities. It may not sound like a big deal, but a 1999 OIG advisory opinion found otherwise (see "OIG guidance on ambulance discounts" below).
Carrying on, as normal
The practice of swapping was common prior to the 1999 advisory opinion, according to R. Michael Scarano Jr., a partner at Foley & Lardner, LLP, in San Diego. Until the advisory opinion, ambulance companies and hospitals did not know this practice was potentially problematic, he says.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Do not code 57288 with 52000
- Searched
