Billing CTs
Compliance Monitor, February 23, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Q: Our staff performed an abdominal/pelvis computed tomography (CT). The physician reviewed the study with the radiologist and ordered a lumbar spine CT. Because we have a multislice CT scanner, our staff did not have to physically rescan the lumbar.
Our staff took the raw data, redid the image processing with a multitude of changes, and using different algorithms and reconstruction planes came up with a lumbar spine scan that produced the same images as would a separate scan of the patient. The radiologist dictated a CT lumbar exam. Various people have told me that they charge a lumbar CT in this instance, because the whole exam is redone, which turns it into a separate and different exam with the full number of images-not just a reconstruction of a particular area.
Should we bill this lumbar reprogramming as a separate procedure?
A: No. Do not bill this lumbar reprogramming as a separate procedure as it does not involve a patient, nor does it involve an additional room/work station or set-up. Also, there are negligible labor costs, and the costs re-lated to a few extra sheets of film, etc., are insignificant.
Although many carriers may allow the Part B professional fees for the interpretation of the film, the additional facility time and costs not already covered by the underlying procedure reimbursement are insignificant.
Providers should not bill for a lumbar CT performed on the same day as an abdominal/pelvic CT, because there is no additional work to justify payment. In addition, the CPT Manual specifically does not allow you to bill these two procedures together.
This answer was provided by HCPro's Briefings on APCs.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Do not code 57288 with 52000
- Searched
