OIG: States aren’t meeting incentive requirements under the Deficit Reduction Act
Compliance Monitor, January 10, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Despite the promise of financial incentives offered to states with laws that meet the OIG state false claims acts criteria, only three states' laws have qualified so far. Only the laws in Illinois, Massachusetts, and Tennessee meet all of the Deficit Reduction Act's (DRA) requirements to qualify for incentives, according to the OIG's review of the states' laws.
Although the DRA provides financial incentives to states that enact their own false claims acts, the state laws must meet certain requirements in the DRA to qualify for those incentives. In August, the OIG published a Federal Register notice outlining its guidelines for reviewing the laws and also invited states to request OIG review of their laws.
The OIG has added a new section to its Web site specifically devoted to reviewing state false claims acts, and so far has posted reviews of laws from California, Florida, Illinois, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, Tennessee, and Texas.
According to the OIG reviews, the laws that don't meet all DRA requirements can be amended and submitted for review by the OIG again. Go to the OIG Web site to read the reviews.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Do not code 57288 with 52000
- Searched
