Pay-for-performance arrangements
Compliance Monitor, November 3, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Q: We are a multi-specialty group practice that has been asked to participate in a pay-for-performance program by a major third-party payor. Should we be aware of any issues with this arrangement?
A: There are two primary issues with this arrangement. The first issue facing any physician practice that desires to participate in a pay-for-performance program is to ensure that the measures the payor is proposing are relevant to the type of medical practice (or array of practices) the group engages in. Payors often want to use a cluster of easy-to-administer performance requirements. However, if these requirements are not relevant to the practice, the practice may end up showing a poor performance in comparison to other practices simply because the measures are inappropriate. This process is more complicated for a multi-specialty group practice because different performance measures are appropriate for different aspects of the practice.
Ensure that appropriate comparisons are going to be made, whether they be with other multi-specialty practices or with specialized practices that provide services similar to those provided by members of your group.
The second issue to consider is to make sure that the performance standards can be measured consistently and accurately. A consistent requirement is established only if the same performance is measured in the same way over time, which is often difficult to accomplish.
Accuracy of measurement has to do with the nature of the performance standard. To the extent possible, subjective performance standards should be avoided. One of the best ways to avoid this problem is to establish agreed upon protocols of care, where the performance standards for those protocols:
For example, many payors are interested in paying for patient satisfaction, a controversial issue since patient satisfaction surveys are notoriously unreliable. There are statistical techniques that can be applied to survey questionnaires to test their reliability. These kinds of issues need to be discussed with the payors before you agree to participate in a pay-for-performance program.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Do not code 57288 with 52000
- Searched
