Billing related to postponed surgery
Compliance Monitor, June 16, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Q:I have a question regarding proper billing procedures in the following scenario: The patient was brought in for a total knee replacement (inpatient only). Our preoperative area began to prep the patient, and during that time, the patient developed nausea and vomiting. Since the patient became ill, he was sent home without having the surgery.
The original intention was to admit the patient as an inpatient. Because the patient was sent home within about an hour of being registered and there were no room charges on the account, the status was changed to outpatient, and the procedure was billed with the CPT code for a total knee with a -73 modifier. The reason for the billing was to try to recoup the costs of the incidental services provided to the patient before he became ill.
The claim was denied because a total knee replacement is an inpatient-only procedure. However, when we spoke to our fiscal intermediary and explained the circumstances, we were told it was not billable as an inpatient either because there were no room and board charges.
Is there a procedure for billing an inpatient only procedure that is cancelled due to patient circumstances?
A:Yes. There are three applicable codes that can be used to recoup expenses in this circumstance
If, however, the provider is still not able to have the claim processed, I would recommend they speak to a supervisor or manager of the fiscal intermediary. Sometimes speaking to a higher-level individual can be beneficial because they maybe able to draw from other resources to resolve the situation.
Thanks to Rhonda Owens, Systems Specialist at Providence Hospital for answering today's question.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
