The DRA means big changes are ahead for providers
Health Care Auditing Strategies, June 1, 2006
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login.
by John Reiss, Esq., partner at Saul Ewing, LLP, in Philadelphia
The Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (DRA) has major consequences for all providers of healthcare services and products paid for by Medicaid. In brief, the act means that states are allowed to reduce benefits and impose additional cost-sharing and premiums on patients. As a result, providers will face more uninsured or underinsured patients.
Higher cost-sharing will likely lead Medicare recipients to delay initial treatment and increase the likelihood that they will become sicker and require more expensive care later on-and that the more expensive care will be underreimbursed. These results will be aggravated because the federal government is restricting the taxes states may levy to match federal financial participation.
State Medicaid programs will have additional federal funding, a stronger incentive to root out fraud, and will probably require providers to adopt more integrity activities. These activities should lead to appropriate Medicaid spending and will likely increase providers' costs of compliance. Finally, under the act, drug manufacturers will receive less money.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
