Inpatient procedure billed as outpatient
Compliance Monitor, June 2, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Q:We recently billed incision of the heart sac (33025) as an outpatient procedure. Medicare denied this claim on the grounds that this procedure is an inpatient-only procedure. What is the best way to handle this?
A: Procedures designated as inpatient only are not reimbursed under the Medicare Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS). Because an inpatient only designated procedure does not have an Ambulatory Payment Classification (APC) group, it will only be paid when the patient is an inpatient at the time the procedure was performed.
The following are some of the reasons these procedures were identified by OPPS as inpatient only:
To receive payment for such a procedure, an inpatient order should be present in the medical record (making the patient an inpatient) prior to performing the procedure. The integral component is the status of the patient when the procedure is performed, not where it was performed.
We recommend that facilities have systems in place to ensure that patients are admitted to the appropriate patient status, i.e. identifying those procedures designated as inpatient only procedures. Basically, a patient should be admitted as an inpatient before an inpatient only procedure is performed to receive reimbursement for performing the procedure.
Unless your claims meet the above criteria, we would caution against rebilling any procedure as inpatient after the claim is rejected, as it may be considered fraudulent.
Thanks to Maggie Mac, CMM, CPC, CMSCS, CCP, ICCE and Rachel Leeds, RHIA, CCS-P, of Pershing Yoakley & Associates, which has offices in Knoxville, TN, Atlanta, Clearwater, FL and Charlotte, NC, for answering today's question.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
