Structuring an arrangement with medical office building staff
Compliance Monitor, May 26, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Q: Our hospital is considering building a medical office building (MOB) adjacent to our hospital. We would like to give preferential treatment to physicians in the community who admit the most patients to our hospital. How should we structure the arrangement?
A: Many hospitals have constructed MOBs to ensure physicians in the community have suitable office space in close proximity to the hospital. I am not sure of your reference to "preferential treatment." The rental of office space safe harbor to the federal anti-kickback statute includes six conditions that must be satisfied. One of the conditions is that the aggregate rental charge is
· consistent with fair market value in an "arms-length transaction"
· not determined by the volume or value of any referrals generated between parties
In addition, an exception to the Stark statute related to compensation arrangements states that the rental charge over the term of the lease agreement is not determined by the volume or value of any referrals generated between parties.
As the hospital begins to lease the MOB, it is acceptable to make available special invitations for select physicians to view the MOB space (provided that no lavish food, entertainment, etc. is included at the viewing). The rental charge for the MOB space should make no distinction between the type of physician or non-provider commercial vendor and the number of referrals that the physician or group makes to the hospital.
Thanks to Bruce D. Armon, Esq., a partner with the Philadelphia-based law firm Saul Ewing LLP, for answering this week's question.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
