OIG continues hunt for errant GME payments
Compliance Monitor, April 12, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
The OIG continues to audit hospitals for appropriate graduate medical education (GME) Medicare reimbursements.
Most recently, the OIG recommended that Medical College of Virginia amend its cost report to effectively refund $1.6 million associated with GME costs that the hospital did not incur.
The OIG's objective was to determine whether the hospital included the appropriate number of dental residents in its full-time equivalent (FTE) counts when computing Medicare payments for fiscal years (FY) 2000-2002.
The OIG found that although the hospital appropriately included dental residents in its FTE counts, in FY 2000 the hospital inappropriately included 41.90 direct GME FTEs and 34.07 indirect GME FTEs in the counts without incurring all of the costs of training dental residents in nonhospital sites that year. Because the FY 2000 FTEs were used in the three-year rolling average, the hospital overstated its direct and indirect GME claims by $1.6 million for the audit period.
The OIG also found that the hospital included instructive time (e.g., classroom, time for the residents when working in nonhospital settings).
In addition to filing an amended cost report, the OIG further recommends that the hospital
The hospital generally disagreed with the OIG's findings and recommendations.
Click here to read the audit report, "Graduate Medical Education for Dental Residents Claimed by the Medical College of Virginia Hospital for Fiscal Years 2000 Through 2002," (A-04-03-06019) issued March 24, 2006.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
