Deficit Reduction Act of 2005
Compliance Monitor, May 3, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
The Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 ("DRA"), which was signed into law on February 8, 2006, contains an often overlooked provision that imposes mandatory compliance obligations on any entity that receives or makes annual Medicaid payments of at least $5 million under a state Medicaid plan. Specifically, the DRA requires, as a condition of payment, that all such entities have the following in place as of January 1, 2007:
This provision of the DRA is noteworthy because, in stark contrast to previous voluntary compliance recommendations, this is the first law to explicitly require certain healthcare providers and entities to have a compliance program as a "condition of payment" under Medicaid. And while not expressly stated in the DRA, this provision implies that any entity that does not comply with these compliance requirements will not be entitled to submit Medicaid claims, and if it does submit claims without having complied, the entity could potentially be liable for submitting false claims under the federal (and state, if applicable) False Claims Act. Therefore, all providers are strongly encouraged to review their compliance program to ensure that it complies with the requirements set forth in the DRA, or, if there is not one already in place, to implement a compliance program prior to the January 1, 2007 deadline.
Thanks to Jacqueline H. Finnegan of Garfunkel, Wild & Travis P.C. in Great Neck, NY for today's tip.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
