When to charge drug administration services
Compliance Monitor, May 12, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Q:I audit emergency department (ED) procedures and am confused about how to charge for an IV (90760) that is initiated in the ambulance en route to the ED. Is it possible to bill for this service?
Also, if a patient is being treated in the ED and gets a normal saline IV just to keep the vein open (KVO), can we charge 90760?
A:To answer the first part of the question, you can bill for an IV initiated in the ambulance en route to the ED. This was addressed in CMS Transmittal 785, issued December 16, 2005, effective January 1, 2006, in section E (infusions started outside the hospital).
Here is the reference: Hospitals may receive Medicare beneficiaries for outpatient services who are in the process of receiving an infusion at their time of arrival at the hospital (e.g. a patient who arrives via ambulance with an ongoing intravenous infusion initiated by paramedics during transport). Hospitals are reminded to bill for all services provided using the HCPCS code(s) that most accurately describe the service(s) they provided. This includes hospitals billing C8950 or C8954 for the first hour of intravenous infusion that the patient receives while at the hospital, even if the hospital did not initiate the infusion, and HCPCS codes for additional hours of infusion if needed.
Once the patient arrives at the hospital, the ED physician should confirm the medical necessity of the IV and document an order for it in the patient's record.
To answer the second part of your question, KVO is not considered hydration services and this order does not meet the criteria for billing C8950 or 90760. Hydrating the patient is used to treat a wide variety of medical conditions or to prevent the patient from dehydrating. KVO is an order to keep the vein access open "just in case," and it is inappropriate to bill an infusion code when medical record documentation states KVO only. CMS wants providers to document medical necessity with drug administration claims. Per Medicare standards, KVO does not meet the criteria.
Thanks to Julie Downey CCS, CPC-H, CPC, Ambulatory Coding Coordinator - HIM at the University of Colorado Hospital for answering this week's question.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
