OIG: Hospital should refund $15,759
Compliance Monitor, March 1, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
The OIG is recommending that the University of Louisville Hospital repay $15,759 after the hospital counted a graduate of a foreign dental school in it's employee count.
The OIG said that the hospital should make the repayment by filing an amended cost report.
The OIG's objective was to determine whether University of Louisville Hospital included the appropriate number of dental residents in its full-time equivalent (FTE) counts when computing Medicare graduate medical education (GME) payments for fiscal years (FYs) 2000 through 2002.
Although the hospital appropriately included dental residents in its FTE counts used to compute FYs 2000 and 2001 GME payments, in FY 2002 the hospital inappropriately included a the dental resident who was a graduate of a foreign dental school. As a result, the hospital overstated its direct and indirect GME claims by $15,759 for FY 2002. The hospital also included didactic, (e.g., classroom, time) for the residents while the residents were working in nonhospital settings.
To perform the audit, the OIG
Click here to read the audit report, "Graduate Medical Education for Dental Residents Claimed by the University of Louisville Hospital for Fiscal Years 2000 Through 2002," (A-04-04-06005) issued February 8, 2006.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
