North Carolina balks at OIG audit results
Compliance Monitor, February 8, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
North Carolina is disputing an OIG audit recommending the state revise its Medicaid policy to ensure that outlier payments achieve budget neutrality.
The OIG conducted the audit to determine whether North Carolina's inpatient hospital cost outlier payments were budget neutral. The OIG found that outlier payments consistently exceeded the 7.2% reduction in diagnosis-related group (DRG) payments. From fiscal years 1998 through 2003, the average cost outlier payment per discharge increased by 128.1% whereas the average DRG base payment per discharge increased by only 14.3%.
North Carolina responded that it did not intend for inpatient hospital outlier payments to be budget neutral and that it had not attempted "to limit or restrict the total amount of outlier payments to the 7.2% calculation," according to the OIG. North Carolina further stated that it "believe[s] that the OIG audit report is based on flawed assumptions," and that the state Medicaid plan made no mention of "budget neutrality."
The state acknowledged that hospitals were escalating charge amounts and said that it would consider revising the Medicaid plan to increase the 7.2% factor and the outlier thresholds.
Click here to read the audit report, "Medicaid Hospital Outlier Payments in North Carolina for State Fiscal Years 1998 through 2002," (A-07-04-04038) issued January 20, 2006.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
