OIG: Connecticut hospital correctly accounted for dental residents
Compliance Monitor, December 28, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
John Dempsey Hospital of Farmington, CT correctly accounted for dental residents in full-time equivalent (FTE) counts for Medicare graduate medical education (GME) payments, according to an OIG audit.
The audit covered GME payments for fiscal years 2000 through 2002.
The OIG conducted the Dempsey Hospital audit as part of a 10-hospital review checking compliance with the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. The act placed some controls on the continuing growth of GME reimbursement by imposing caps on the number of residents that hospitals are allowed to count for the purpose of direct and indirect GME payments. Dental FTEs are not included in the caps.
The legislation also created incentives for hospitals to train residents in freestanding nonhospital settings, such as clinics and ambulatory surgical centers, by permitting hospitals to count FTE residents who train in nonhospital settings in their calculations of indirect and to direct GME payments.
The OIG is reviewing 10 hospitals to determine the effect of the Balanced Budget Act on direct and indirect GME payments for dental residents included in hospitals' counts of FTE residents.
To complete the audit, the OIG
Click here to read the audit report, "Graduate Medical Education for Dental Residents Claimed by John Dempsey Hospital for Fiscal Years 2000 Through 2002," (A-04-04-06010) issued November 14, 2005.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
