OIG: Ohio must pay back $142,964
Compliance Monitor, December 21, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
The OIG has recommended that the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services refund Medicaid $142,964. An OIG audit determined that the state filed improper claims for reimbursement of skilled-professional-medical-personnel costs.
An OIG audit has determined that the agency improperly claimed enhanced reimbursement for skilled professional medical personnel costs and was overpaid $120,464 in federal funds.
These improper costs included
Because of an accounting error in the state agency's second-quarter claim for federal reimbursement, the federal share was overstated by an additional $22,500. The state also claimed salary and fringe benefits for 138 individuals at the enhanced rate.
The OIG also recommended that the state work with regional CMS officials to establish an appropriate portion of the $893,281 in enhanced funding associated with skilled professional medical personnel activities.
To perform the audit, the OIG
Click here to read the audit report, "Audit of Ohio's Medicaid Payments for Skilled Professional Medical Personnel for the Period October 1, 2002 Through September 30, 2003," (A-05-04-00078) issued November 18, 2005.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
