OIG: New York must repay $43.3 million
Healthcare Auditing Weekly, November 15, 2005
The OIG has recommended that the state of New York refund the federal government $43.3 million in overpayments made to non-state government nursing homes for state fiscal years (SFY) 2003, 2004, and 2005.
The OIG found that New York based its SFY 2003 transition period excess payment, totaling $674.3 million (of which $337.2 million was the federal share), on estimated-rather than actual-Medicaid payment data from the base year.
The OIG's audit objective was to determine whether New York calculated the category-specific upper payment limit (UPL) for non-state government inpatient hospitals in accordance with federal and state laws in SFY 2003. The OIG also wanted to know whether New York calculated the category-specific UPL and the transition period excess payment for non-state government nursing homes in accordance with the law.
New York did correctly calculate the SFY 2003 category-specific UPL for both hospitals and nursing homes and included hospital payments in the disproportionate share hospital limits. However, contrary to federal regulations, New York based its SFY 2003 transition period excess payment on estimated, rather than actual, Medicaid payment data.
To accomplish their objectives, the OIG
Click here to read the audit report, "Audit of New York State's Medicaid Upper Payment Limits for Non-State Government Inpatient Hospitals and Nursing Homes," (A-02-03-01021) issued October 19, 2005.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Q/A: Correct use of modifier -PT
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Searched
