GOV’T AUDIT INSIDER OIG to North Carolina: Refund $8.2 million
Healthcare Auditing Weekly, October 28, 2005
The OIG has determined that North Carolina should refund $8.2 million in federal money that was transferred into North Carolina's general and Year 2000 (Y2K) funds.
The OIG audited refunds and transfers from the state's Information Technology Services' (ITS) internal service fund for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 and all transfers that ITS made to the state's Y2K fund in fiscal years 1997 and 1998.
The OIG determined that ITS transferred $34.2 million in excess revenues from its internal service fund to the state's Y2K fund and general fund. The state failed to return the federal share of $8.2 million (consisting of $4.5 million transferred to the Y2K fund and $3.7 million transferred to the general fund).
The state made the oversight because ITS did not have procedures in place to ensure that the federal government received its share of all revenues in excess of costs, according to the OIG. In addition to recommending the refunds, the OIG further recommended that the state implement appropriate procedures to ensure that the federal government receives its share of any revenues in excess of costs in the future.
To accomplish the audit the OIG
State officials generally disagreed with the findings. Despite the state's assertions, the OIG continues to believe their calculations are accurate.
Click here to read the audit report, "Audit of the North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services Internal Service Fund ," (A-04-04-03503) issued Sept. 30, 2005.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Q/A: Correct use of modifier -PT
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- "Wall fountains" may be spreading Legionnaires to patients, visitors
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Searched
