OIG: Hospital failed to follow year-end claims billing rules
Compliance Monitor, September 21, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
The OIG found that a Maine hospital did not bill fiscal year-end claims for its inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF) in accordance with Medicare regulations. As a result, Medicare made net overpayments totaling $254,915. The hospital received inaccurate information from its fiscal intermediary that contributed to the problem of split billing in 2003 and 2004.
The OIG recommended that the hospital
continue to work with its fiscal intermediary to complete a voluntary repayment process
determine the resulting effect on its Medicare cost reports for 2002 - 2004
The OIG took the following steps to complete the audit:
Reviewed applicable Medicare laws, regulations, and guidance
Extracted paid claims data for 2002, 2003, and 2004 from CMS's National Claims History and the fiscal intermediary's claims processing system
Identified a universe of 76 inpatient rehabilitation claims incorrectly billed by the hospital at its fiscal year end
Reviewed applicable detailed records for the claims from CMS's Common Working File to verify that the claims represented a single inpatient rehabilitation stay
Calculated the effect of incorrect billing by using CMS's Pricer Program
Discussed the results of the review with the hospital's fiscal intermediary, Associated Hospital Service, Inc.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
