Hospital pays $3.6 million to settle upcoding allegations
Compliance Monitor, July 27, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
A California healthcare provider has paid $3.6 million to settle allegations that it routinely upcoded Medicare claims for pneumonia treatments and other services.
Simi Valley Hospital and Health Care Services in Los Angeles paid the settlement on July 19, but did not admit to wrongdoing.
"Upcoding" means submitting claims for more intensive or sophisticated levels of service than what was actually documented in a patients' Medicare record, according to a statement by the U.S. Department of Justice.
The Department of Health and Human Services found evidence that from 1993 though 1998, Simi Valley Hospital routinely classified pneumonia cases as "severe respiratory infections" a more serious form of pneumonia than was actually treated. The investigation also found questionable billing practices related to claims for respiratory problems and septicemia, a life threatening form of blood poisoning.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
-
Strategies for Health Care Compliance
News and real-life examples to increase the effectiveness of your compliance program. Strategies for Health Care Compliance...
-
Compliance Monitor
This HTML e-mail newsletter delivers news on Medicare and Medicaid fraud and abuse, as well as recent documents and targets...
-
Medicare Weekly Update
Each issue of Medicare Weekly Update includes the latest CMS proposed and final rules, CMS manual revisions, and...
-
Medicare Update for Physician Services
Medicare Update for Physician Services is a free, monthly e-zine that delivers news and information to help physician...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Do not code 57288 with 52000
- Searched