Lester Crawford approved to head FDA
Compliance Monitor, July 20, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Lester Crawford approved to head FDA
The U.S. Senate has confirmed Lester Crawford to oversee the Food and Drug Administration.
The vote, which occurred Monday, was overwhelmingly in his favor, with 78 Senators for and 16 Senators against his nomination. Crawford had been acting director of the FDA since March of 2004.
President George W. Bush nominated Crawford as the permanent head of the agency in February. However, speculation over controversies that occurred at the agency during Crawford's tenure as acting director held up the nomination, according to The Boston Globe.
Some of this criticism surfaced Monday, before Crawford was approved. U.S. Senator Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, criticized Crawford for not listening to internal critics and for recent drug-safety scares-including withdrawal of the painkiller Vioxx, reported The Boston Globe.
Senators Patty Murray, (D-Wash) and Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) placed a hold on Crawford's nomination because the FDA has yet to approve the so-called "morning-after pill" as a nonprescription drug, according to The Washington Post. The senators said the FDA held up approval because of the controversial nature of the drug. The Senators withdrew the hold after receiving assurances a decision would be made on the morning-after pill by Sept. 1, reported the Post.
Despite his critics, Crawford carried the day on Monday. He was approved by a role call vote.
"While I respected the right of my colleagues to disagree with a president's choice, in the end, I believe we have made the right decision to promote Dr. Crawford," said Senator Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.), according to The Washington Post. "He has a long and distinguished history of leadership and public service, and I look forward to his continued work in promoting and protecting the public health."
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Do not code 57288 with 52000
- Searched
