Tip: What to do when patients won't sign an ABN
Compliance Monitor, July 6, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
5. Tip: What to do when patients won't sign an ABN
Under Medicare's Limitations on Liability provision, providers can bill beneficiaries who refuse to sign the advance beneficiary notice (ABN) but who demand the service as along as staff properly conduct and document the benefits-determination process and provide the patient with an ABN. That is, providers who inform beneficiaries of the likelihood of a Medicare denial can bill patients even without their signature.
To document such a situation, you and a second witness should sign and annotate the space designed for the beneficiary's signature on the ABN to state that the patient refused to sign the document.
However, Medicare's Refund Requirement clause still protects patients who refuse to sign the ABN. Medical suppliers and physicians who do not participate in Medicare must obtain the patient's signature or Medicare will not pay for the services or items they provide.
Providers can deny a service to a beneficiary who has refused to sign an ABN unless the consequences (e.g., health and safety of the patient or civil liability in the case of harm) rule out this option. Contact the ordering physician to determine whether the patient's care would be compromised by not performing the test.
The above tip is an excerpt from the "ABN Training Handbook for Labs," copyright 2005 by HCPro, Inc. This handbook is a training tool for helping your laboratory staff understand which services require ABNs, how to obtain an ABN, and how to discuss ABN use with physicians and others who refer patients to the laboratory. Click here for more information or to order your copy today.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Do not code 57288 with 52000
- Searched
