Lab agrees to refund improperly billed patients
Compliance Monitor, July 6, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
MDS Inc, a Canadian-based company that performs medical laboratory services, has agreed to pay refunds to scores of New York customers who received improper medical bills, according to the New York attorney general's Office.
Additionally, the company agreed to reform billing practices, so that when it submits a claim to a health plan, it will not bill patients until the plan notifies MDS that the consumer may be liable. As many as 2 million claims could be subject to the agreement with MDS, according to the attorney general's Office.
"My office is committed to protecting consumers from unwittingly paying out-of-pocket for services and care that actually is covered by their health plans," said New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer
The state attorney general's office found that MDS improperly "balance billed" some consumers by charging them for the entire balance of the bill when MDS had submitted a claim to the consumer's health plan but received no response from the health plan. In certain instances, both the health plan and the consumer paid the billed amount in full, resulting in MDS improperly receiving double payment on a single bill, according to Spitzer's office.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Do not code 57288 with 52000
- Searched
