Tip: How to apply charity-care criteria
Compliance Monitor, June 22, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Because a number of factors are involved in making an appropriate charity determination, staff should have the flexibility to apply sound judgment to each case.
Providers are free to apply similar criteria in different ways. For example, one provider may establish a procedure to deem certain types of cases as automatically qualified for charity, while another provider may require case-by-case determinations.
Likewise, a provider may define medical indigence as a patient covered by Medicare and Medicaid and may allow charity processing based on the validity of this insurance coverage. Another provider may opt to require completed charity applications for this class of patients.
A similar situation exists in relationship to convertible/liquid assets, the patient's net worth, and a catastrophic medical situation. One provider may require that the patient apply a percentage of his or her assets to the outstanding medical bills, whereas another provider may execute the charity determination based on the catastrophic nature of the medical expenses.
Providers must also discuss two other issues regarding the criteria used to make charity determinations:
The provider's procedures for charity-care determinations should also discuss how to process applications when the provider cannot determine eligibility for charity care due to insufficient information. Likewise, providers should base the verification process on the material value involved. For example, it is not sound business practice to expend four hours of staff time to verify eligibility for a $50 charity adjustment. Conversely, it is well worth spending four hours to determine charity eligibility for a patient with a bill of $35,000. The provider should identify the verification steps required to provide cost-effective process.
This week's tip was excerpted from Charity Care: Tools to Manage the Uninsured Population by Sandra J. Wolfskill. Copyright 2005 by HCPro Inc.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Compliance Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- Do not code 57288 with 52000
- Searched
